目标威胁等级风险控制传感器管理方法

doi:10.19665/j.issn1001-2400.2019.02.016

西安电子科技大学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 95-100.doi: 10.19665/j.issn1001-2400.2019.02.016

目标威胁等级风险控制传感器管理方法

庞策,单甘霖,段修生

陆军工程大学石家庄校区电子与光学工程系,河北石家庄 050000

收稿日期:2018-09-12 出版日期:2019-04-20 发布日期:2019-04-20
作者简介:庞策(1993-),男,陆军工程大学博士研究生,Email:guanglongzhu@163.com
基金资助:
国家部委预研基金(012015012600A2203)

Sensor management method under target threat level risk control

PANG Ce,SHAN Ganlin,DUAN Xiusheng

Department of Electronic and Optical Engineering, Army Engineering Univ., Shijiazhuang 050000, China

Received:2018-09-12 Online:2019-04-20 Published:2019-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对目标跟踪过程中由于模型及观测误差对目标威胁度估计不够准确的问题,将目标威胁度不确定性最小化为优化目标。基于隐马尔科夫理论及风险理论,提出了一种目标威胁等级风险控制下的传感器管理模型,设计了一种基于多Agent理论的分布式传感器管理方案求解算法。仿真实验表明,通过该模型能够顺利地解决传感器资源不足情况下的管理问题,求解质量较高,速度较快。

关键词: 传感器管理, 威胁等级, 不确定性, 风险理论

Abstract:

Due to the model error and the observation error, the inaccurate estimate of target threat exists when tracking targets. To solve the problem, minimizing the uncertainty of target threat is taken as the goal when managing sensors. Based on the Hidden Markov Model and risk theory, a sensor management model under the control of target threat level risk is proposed in this paper. A distributed optimization algorithm based on the multiple Agent theory is designed to get the optimal management scheme. Simulation experiments show that the model proposed in this paper can successfully solve the management problem in the case of insufficient sensor resources, and that by the algorithm in this paper perfect solutions can be obtained with a fast computational speed.

Key words: sensor management, threat level, the uncertainty, risk theory

中图分类号:

TP212

庞策,单甘霖,段修生. 目标威胁等级风险控制传感器管理方法[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报, 2019, 46(2): 95-100.

PANG Ce,SHAN Ganlin,DUAN Xiusheng. Sensor management method under target threat level risk control[J]. Journal of Xidian University, 2019, 46(2): 95-100.

图/表 3

参考文献 13

[1]	方德亮, 冉晓旻, 李欧 . 一种能量有效的分布式传感器管理算法[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报, 2017,44(2):171-177. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2400.2017.02.029
	FANG Deliang, RAN Xiaomin, LI Ou . Energy Efficient Distributed Sensor Management Algorithm[J]. Journal of Xidian University, 2017,44(2):171-177. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2400.2017.02.029
[2]	SAURAV S, YIMIN D Z, MOENESS G A , et al. Cramer-Rao Type Bounds for Sparsity-aware Multi-sensor Multi-target Tracking[J]. Signal Processing, 2018,145(1):68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2017.11.014
[3]	ASGHAR A B, JAWAID S T, SMITH S L . A Complete Greedy Algorithm for Infinite-horizon Sensor Scheduling[J]. Automatica, 2017,81(1):335-341. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2017.04.018
[4]	GOSTAR A K, HOSEINNEZHAD R, BAB-HADIASHAR A , et al. Sensor-management for Multitarget Filters via Minimization of Posterior Dispersion[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2017,53(6):2877-2884. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2017.2718280
[5]	BUKAL M, MARKOVIC I, PETROVIC I . Score Matching Based Assumed Density Filtering with the Von Mises-Fisher Distribution[C]// Proceedings of the 2017 20th International Conference on Information Fusion. Piscataway: IEEE, 2017: 8009680.
[6]	SAYIN M O, LIN C W, SHIRAISHI S , et al. Information-driven Autonomous Intersection Control via Incentive Compatible Mechanisms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2018,99(1):1-13. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2018.2838049
[7]	SEAN M . Risk-based Sensor Resource Management for Field of View Constraint Sensor[C]// Proceedings of the 2015 18th International Conference on Information Fusion. Piscataway: IEEE, 2015: 2041-2048.
[8]	EDUARDO GOMES BORGES M, MALTESE D, VANHEEGHE P , et al. Sensor Management Using Expected Risk Reduction Approach[C]// Proceedings of the 2016 19th International Conference on Information Fusion. Piscataway: IEEE, 2016: 2050-2058.
[9]	GOMES-BORGES M E, MALTESE D, VANHEEGHE P , et al. A Risk-based Sensor Management Using Random Finite Sets and POMDP[C]// Proceedings of the 2017 20th International Conference on Information Fusion. Piscataway: IEEE, 2017: 8009843.
[10]	KATSILIERIS F, DRIESSEN H, YAROVOY A . Threat-based Sensor Management for Target Tracking[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2015,51(4):2772-2785. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2015.140052
[11]	陈辉, 贺忠良, 连峰 , 等. 多目标跟踪中基于目标威胁度评估的传感器控制方法研究[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2018,40:1-7. doi: 10.11999/JEIT180212
	CHEN Hui, HE Zhongliang, LIAN Feng , et al. Treat Assessment Based Sensor Control for Multi-target Tracking[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2018,40:1-7. doi: 10.11999/JEIT180212
[12]	李志汇, 刘昌云, 倪鹏 , 等. 反导多传感器协同任务规划综述[J]. 宇航学报, 2016,37(1):29-38. doi: 10.3873/j.issn.10001328.2016.01.004
	LI Zhihui, LIU Changyun, NI Peng , et al. Review on Multisensor Cooperative Mission Planning in Anti-TBM System[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2016,37(1):29-38. doi: 10.3873/j.issn.10001328.2016.01.004
[13]	KRISHNAMURTHY V . Emission Management for Low Probability Intercept Sensors in Network Centric Warfare[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2005,41(1):133-152. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2005.1413752

目标威胁等级风险控制传感器管理方法

Sensor management method under target threat level risk control

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 13

相关文章 6

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	肖利军,郭继昌,顾翔元. 一种采用冗余性动态权重的特征选择算法[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报, 2019, 46(5): 155-161.
[2]	刘英挺;朱睿杰;杜晓明;赵永利. 全光网中采用可信度模型的故障定位技术[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报, 2016, 43(6): 152-157.
[3]	李青山;李珺;叶宏;杜林. 分布式调试中基于事件模型的确定性重演策略[J]. J4, 2010, 37(5): 872-878.
[4]	陈国培1;李俊民1;杨莹1;2. 一类不确定脉冲混合系统的非脆弱控制器设计 [J]. J4, 2008, 35(1): 65-70.
[5]	曹鸿钧;段宝岩. 基于凸集模型的多学科耦合系统不确定性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 32(3): 335-338.
[6]	暂时无作者信息. 非线性不确定系统的鲁棒镇定[J]. J4, 2000, 27(4): 429-433.