基于Hyper Works的6杆并联机床的优化设计

doi:10.16180/j.cnki.issn1007-7820.2020.09.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对并联机床加工过程中发生共振导致机构变形进而影响零件加工精度的问题,文中以6杆并联机床为研究对象,采用拓扑优化的方法对并联机床床身进行优化。首先确定床身的优化部位为立柱、横架和定台,运用HyperWorks中拓扑优化模块对其优化,通过添加一定的加强筋来整修优化立柱和横架,对立柱的筋板尺寸进一步优化。优化后运用模态分析和谐响应分析进行整机验证,对比优化前后模型,发现优化后的模型总质量减少了17.8%,前三阶共振频率分别增加了19.56%、20.62%、0.091%,共振峰值在X、Y、Z方向降低了49.454%、29.036%、0.0078%。对结果分析可知优化后的并联机床在加工中避免了共振的发生,其加工精度得到了提高。

关键词: 并联机床, 共振, 加工精度, 拓扑优化, 模态分析, 谐响应

Abstract:

In view of the problem that the resonance phenomenon occurs in the process of parallel machine, which leads to the deformation of the mechanism and affects the machining precision. The 6-bar parallel machine is taken as the research object, and topology optimization method is used to optimize the bed of the parallel machine. Firstly, the optimized parts of the bed are determined as the column, the cross frame and fixed platform, which are optimized by topology optimization module in HyperWorks. The column and cross frame are optimized by adding some reinforcement. The size of the stiffeners of the column is further optimized. Modal analysis and harmonious response analysis are used to verify the whole machine. Comparing the model before and after optimization, it is found that the total mass of the optimized model is reduced by 17.8%, and the first three order resonance frequencies increases by 19.56%, 20.62% and 0.091%, respectively. The resonance peak decreases by 49.454%, 29.036% and 0.0078% in X, Y and Z directions. The analysis of the results show that the optimized parallel machine avoids the occurrence of resonance during processing, and the machining accuracy has been significantly improved.

Key words: parallelmachine, resonance, machiningaccuracy, topologyoptimization, modalanalysis, harmonic response

中图分类号:

程华祥,陈捷,张驰. 基于Hyper Works的6杆并联机床的优化设计[J]. 电子科技, 2020, 33(9): 25-30.

CHENG Huaxiang,CHEN Jie,ZHANG Chi. Optimal Design of 6-bar Parallel Machine Tool Based on HyperWorks[J]. Electronic Science and Technology, 2020, 33(9): 25-30.

图/表 20

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

表1

图14

表2

图15

图16

图17

表3

参考文献 16

[1]	陈小岗. 交叉杆式6轴并联机床误差及刚度特性研究[D]. 南京:南京理工大学, 2013.
	Chen Xiaogang. Error and stiffness characteristics of cross-bar 6-axis parallel machine tool[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2013.
[2]	张曙. 并联运动机床[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2003.
	Zhang Shu. Parallel motion machine[M]. Beijing: Machinery Industry Press, 2003.
[3]	董旭, 高铁红. 三自由度并联机床动力学响应研究[J]. 组合机床与自动化加工技术, 2018(11):30-33,42.
	Dong Xu, Gao Tiehong. Dynamic response research of 3-dof parallel machine tool[J]. Modular Machine Tool and Automatic Machining Technology, 2018(11):30-33,42.
[4]	隋允康, 叶红玲. 连续体结构拓扑优化的ICM方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013
	Sui Yunkang, Ye Hongling. ICM method for topology optimization of continuum structure[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2013.
[5]	刘成颖, 谭锋, 等. 面向机床整机动态性能的立柱结构优化设计研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2016,52(3):161-167.
	Liu Chengying, Tan Feng, et al. Optimization design of column structure for dynamic performance of machine tool[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016,52(3):161-167.
[6]	梅雪峰, 高瑞芳. 机床床身结构优化设计方法研究[J]. 现代制造技术与装备, 2019(1):22-23.
	Mei Xuefeng, Gao Ruifang. Research on optimization design method of machine tool bed structure[J]. Modern Manufacturing Technology and Equipment, 2019(1):22-23.
[7]	陈锤福, 蓝双, 杨晓翔, 等. 基于SIMP理论的衡器载荷测量仪悬臂梁拓扑优化研究[J]. 机电工程, 2016,33(4):383-387.
	Chen Chuifu, Lan Shuang, Yang Xiaoxiang, et al. Study on topology optimization of cantilever beam of weighing instrument based on SIMP theory[J]. Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, 2016,33(4):383-387.
[8]	朱剑峰, 龙凯, 陈潇凯, 等. 多工况及动态连续体结构拓扑优化中的工程约束技术[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2015,35(3):251-255
	Zhu Jianfeng, Long Kai, Chen Xiaokai. Engineering constraints in topology optimization of multi-condition and dynamic continuum structures[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2015,35(3):251-255.
[9]	郑彬, 张敬东. 数控铣床床身静动态特性分析与优化[J]. 机床与液压, 2019,47(8):181-186.
	Zheng Bin, Zhang Jingdong. Analysis and optimization of static and dynamic characteristics of CNC milling machine[J]. Machine Tool & Hydraulics, 2019,47(8):181-186
[10]	葛泽稷, 丁晓红, 张横. 机床床身的动力学模型修正技术研究[J]. 电子科技, 2017,30(8):70-72.
	Ge Zeji, Ding Xiaohong, Zhang Heng. Research on dynamic model correction technology of machine tool bed[J]. Electronic Science and Technology, 2017,30(8):70-72.
[11]	高东强, 王伟, 陈超群, 等. 高速立式加工中心床身结构分析及优化[J]. 陕西科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2014,32(5):142-147.
	Gao Dongqiang, Wang Wei, Chen Chaoqun, et al. Structure analysis and optimization of high-speed vertical machining center bed[J]. Journal of Shaanxi University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2014,32(5):142-147.
[12]	米洁, 甄真, 杨庆东. 高精度加工中心床身结构拓扑优化研究与实践[J]. 机械设计与研究, 2019,35(2):113-116.
	Mi Jie, Zhen Zhen, Yang Qingdong. Research and practice of high precision machining center bed structure topology optimization[J]. Mechanical Design and Research, 2019,35(2):113-116.
[13]	Li Wei, Li Beishi, Yang Jianguo. Dynamic characteristics analysis of a micro grinding machine tool[C]. Shanghai:The Third International Conference on Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering(ICMME), 2016.
[14]	张业成, 罗生梅. 卧式加工中心床身结构特性分析及轻量化设[J]. 机械设计, 2018,35(4):55-61.
	Zhang Yecheng, Luo Shengmei. Structural characteristics analysis and lightweight equipment for horizontal machining center bed[J]. Mechanical Design, 2008,35(4):55-61.
[15]	杜海堂, 张荣兴. 空间3-PRC柔顺并联机构拓扑优化设计[J]. 组合机床与自动化加工技术, 2017,9(1):31-39.
	Du Haitang, Zhang Rongxing. Topology optimization design of space 3-PRC flexible parallel mechanism[J]. Modular Machine Tool and Automation Technology, 2017,9(1):31-39.
[16]	李灿丽, 刘祖国, 舒成松, 等. 数控机床工作平台机构的动态特性分析[J]. 组合机床与自动化加工技术, 2019(3):20-23.
	Li Canli, Liu Guoguo, Shu Chengsong. Dynamic characteristics analysis of working platform mechanism of CNC machine tools[J]. Combined Machine Tools and Automatic Processing Technology, 2019(3):20-23.

参数	优化前	优化后	参数改变量/%
质量/kg	10 069.00	8 276.90	-17.80
第1阶频率/Hz	94.50	105.41	+11.54
第2阶频率/Hz	166.29	167.99	+1.01
第3阶频率/Hz	233.95	240.99	+3.01

频率阶次	1	2	3	4	5	6
原始结构	59.470	63.508	92.612	102.490	116.990	124.440
优化结构	71.104	76.608	92.696	106.840	116.360	124.570
改变量/%	+19.560	+20.620	+0.091	+4.244	-0.539	+0.104

方向	X方向	Y方向	Z方向
原始结构共振峰值/mm	1.190 6	0.531 3	0.254 9
优化结构共振峰值/mm	0.501 8	0.377 1	0.245 7
变化量/%	-49.454	29.036	-0.007 8